Omnia Health is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Medical malpractice litigation: Undermining South Africa’s health system

Article-Medical malpractice litigation: Undermining South Africa’s health system

According to South African Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, there has been an ‘explosion’ of medical malpractice litigation claims in the country over the past few years in both the public and private health sectors, as compassion-based practice of medicine is slowly giving way to defensive medicine and mistrust.

In 2017, it was reported that Gauteng Health Department alone had paid out at least R1 billion in lawsuits since January 2015 while the Eastern Cape is facing pay outs of R14 billion.

The Medical Protection Society SA (MPS), in 2015 settled a claim of almost R24 million on behalf of a member and has reported a 35% increase in the number of claims made against healthcare professionals between 2011 and 2016, with larger claims, in particular, on the rise. MPS further reports that claims over R1 million have increased nearly 550% compared to those of 10 years ago and claims of more than R5 million increased by 900% from 2008 to 2013.

What, therefore, are the reasons for the rise in medical claims? According to Justin Malherbe, Senior Associate at international law firm Norton Rose Fulbright, one among the several reasons include an increase in public awareness of patient rights coupled with incessant and deliberate marketing by personal injury lawyers eager to capitalise on this awareness.

“Amendments to South African legislation, such as the Road Accident Fund (RAF) legislation is also to blame,” he adds, explaining that with damages claims during motor vehicle accidents becoming less profitable for lawyers, they are turning to other forms of personal injury litigation like medical malpractice.

Professor Sylvester Chima, Associate Professor and Head at the Programme of Bio and Research Ethics and Medical Law at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, believes that the high levels of lawsuits in South Africa are in part due to the legal framework which both governs and protects patients and healthcare providers.

“A good example of this is the law around Termination of Pregnancy (TOP) which provides for termination up to 40 weeks of pregnancy for severe congenital abnormalities. This means that if a doctor fails to diagnose a severe abnormality, the parents may sue the doctor for maintenance costs for the child,” says Prof Chima, who will be presenting his findings at the 2018 Africa Health Congress.

Another example is the law which obligates health professionals to obtain signed consent from patients before providing their services, but which many doctors do not adhere to, leaving them vulnerable to malpractice claims.

In South Africa, it is not only the number of claims which continue to rise but also the size of the claims and pay outs. Malherbe explains that the costs of ‘catastrophic claims’, such as those for birth defects and brain injuries, have risen drastically as the cost of caring for patients has increased due to technological advancements which improve life expectancy and quality of life.

Both experts agree, however, that progressive interventions need to be found to stem the litigation tide.

Professor Chima suggests that the current system relies on ‘righting a wrong’ through the courts, which by its nature is expensive and adversarial. “A compensation fund, similar to the UK’s Clinical Negligence Scheme Trust, where cases are mediated and settled would save on expensive legal fees but still compensate those who have been affected by medical negligence,” he says.

Malherbe comments that stakeholders in both the private and public health sectors are committed to changing the claims situation by implementing better risk management strategies and renewed interventions, such as defined standards of care; managing patient expectations versus outcomes and improving patient experience through timeous communication and education.

“The shared hope of all stakeholders is that the current effects of the rise in medical malpractice claims can be off-set by timeous intervention and a co-ordinated approach to preserve the stability and ensure the sustainability of healthcare in the future,” concludes Malherbe.

Both Professor Chima and Justin Malherbe will be speaking at the Ethics, Human Rights & Medical Law Conference at Africa Health Exhibition & Congress 2018 to be held at Johannesburg, South Africa, from 29 – 31 May.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.